Author Topic: Adding a Reconnaissance section to the unit  (Read 9734 times)

Greybeard

  • Posts: 14
Adding a Reconnaissance section to the unit
« on: April 10, 2015, 07:49:29 AM »
Hey guys, I was wondering if you had ever thought about adding a organic recon section to each line platoon. I have noticed that on several missions a recon element would be very useful for priority information requirements like identifying avenues of approach, targeted areas of interest, enemy strength, location and capabilities etc etc. Even a 2 man section per platoon would be able to be sent off on a recon patrol at the very beginning of a mission while the Opord was being issued to the troops and upon their return (even just 15 minutes would be enough) any Fragos could be issued.   

Capt (Ret) Morgan

  • 11F3B Fighter pilot
  • Retired
  • Posts: 314
Re: Adding a Reconnaissance section to the unit
« Reply #1 on: April 10, 2015, 08:01:33 AM »
At present, Brawler acts as our recon element as they are often the first units to reach the active AO. Often they will relay any important information that will impact our plans.  There is no real need for a reconnaissance element.
G. MORGAN
Capt, USAF
Retired


VandeVord

  • Posts: 401
Re: Adding a Reconnaissance section to the unit
« Reply #2 on: April 10, 2015, 08:49:15 AM »
Personally for me I don't think we need it. Here's why. I spent 4 months on the ground as a weapons squad leader here in the 506th. During that time Brawler did a pretty good job at seeing or finding the enemy's front lines almost every op. Also I personally rather enjoyed having only half an idea of what was going on in the AO and discovering and adapting to the rest as we went along. If you already know about everything in  an AO, kinda takes half the fun out of it.

Also keep in mind I spent nearly 15 months as a recon man the 15thMEU gaming unit, where most of us came from, and I took said knowledge set into consideration for this reply.
« Last Edit: April 10, 2015, 08:51:35 AM by 2d Lt(T) VandeVord »

Joyce

  • Posts: 151
Re: Adding a Reconnaissance section to the unit
« Reply #3 on: April 10, 2015, 09:40:30 AM »
To expound on what the other gentlemen have said, the reason Brawler tends to fill a reconnaissance role is not by design; we just have to leave early to get to the AO at the same time, since Bradleys move considerably slower than Blackhawks. This usually results in us getting to the area before the infantry do, finding some high ground, and getting a good look at the landing zone and surrounding area, a few minutes in advance of the main force's arrival

Greybeard

  • Posts: 14
Re: Adding a Reconnaissance section to the unit
« Reply #4 on: April 10, 2015, 10:51:23 AM »
I take it that this unit only plays against AI. In that case you can definitely afford not to have a dedicated recon team. It also does make it more interesting not to have a clear picture of the situation. I just thought that the skills of a recon team could also be used by regular riflemen. Thanks for the timely responses...

VandeVord

  • Posts: 401
Re: Adding a Reconnaissance section to the unit
« Reply #5 on: April 10, 2015, 12:45:12 PM »
Very basic forms of recon are used by the platoon, squads and teams. It was regular practice to get good eyes on the AO and check it out for a minute before making last minute adjustments. Also even during the middle of the op, sometimes a team is pushed up 50-100m to have a peek and then they come back.

MAJ (Ret) Hayes

  • 11A Infantry Officer
  • Retired
  • Posts: 1147
Re: Adding a Reconnaissance section to the unit
« Reply #6 on: April 10, 2015, 05:27:18 PM »
I like to speak very straight forward in my replies. The Command Staff of the 506th is also very cautious about creating any kind of unit that can be seen as "special forces". In our experience having these kinds of special snow-flake units inside a larger infantry-centric unit only breeds dissent and unwarranted feelings of superiority / inferiority. None of which is actually appropriate in a cooperative gaming unit.
P. HAYES
MAJ, USA
Retired


CPT Drumheller

  • 18A Special Forces Officer
  • Combat Element
  • Posts: 3957
Re: Adding a Reconnaissance section to the unit
« Reply #7 on: April 11, 2015, 01:49:07 AM »
Brawler is not a recon unit.
J. DRUMHELLER
CPT, SF
Commanding Officer, ODA 5221, Co B\2-5th SFG


Greybeard

  • Posts: 14
Re: Adding a Reconnaissance section to the unit
« Reply #8 on: April 11, 2015, 07:53:03 AM »
I was going to say...I never heard of a mechanized unit conducting regular recon for a light infantry unit...lol

Capt (Ret) Morgan

  • 11F3B Fighter pilot
  • Retired
  • Posts: 314
Re: Adding a Reconnaissance section to the unit
« Reply #9 on: April 11, 2015, 09:05:11 AM »
Brawler is not a recon unit.

No one said it was, we said it ends up performing those roles due to the the nature of the way they operate.  For example, being in front of everyone else in the unit.
G. MORGAN
Capt, USAF
Retired


SFC (Ret) M. Brewer

  • 68W3O Health Care Specialist
  • Retired
  • Posts: 1202
Re: Adding a Reconnaissance section to the unit
« Reply #10 on: April 11, 2015, 10:05:29 AM »
Brawler is not a recon unit.

No one said it was, we said it ends up performing those roles due to the the nature of the way they operate.  For example, being in front of everyone else in the unit.

Believe me, Brawler is happy to fulfill a role in forward observation but the way we do recon isn't exactly what I would call proactive.  We find a place to conceal our not exactly small vehicle and only engage enemy if forced into the situation.  The few times when we've been in advance of the rest of the unit, backup is a loooooong way away.  When in those situations, we rely greatly on our air assets to cover our butts.
M. BREWER
SFC, USA
Retired


Capt (Ret) Morgan

  • 11F3B Fighter pilot
  • Retired
  • Posts: 314
Re: Adding a Reconnaissance section to the unit
« Reply #11 on: April 11, 2015, 11:18:26 AM »
Brawler is not a recon unit.

No one said it was, we said it ends up performing those roles due to the the nature of the way they operate.  For example, being in front of everyone else in the unit.

Believe me, Brawler is happy to fulfill a role in forward observation but the way we do recon isn't exactly what I would call proactive.  We find a place to conceal our not exactly small vehicle and only engage enemy if forced into the situation.  The few times when we've been in advance of the rest of the unit, backup is a loooooong way away.  When in those situations, we rely greatly on our air assets to cover our butts.

In every operation I have been in so far, Brawler has pushed to the front of every task force before any other asset, naturally whether you want to or not you are still conducting recon during that time.  Proactive or not, unless you walk around with your eyes closed, you are doing it.

Just because the word "recon" is used, doesn't mean I am suggesting it is your primary role.  My primary role is not recon yet I still sit up there pointing out things that I see long before anyone else does.  Using the word recon doesn't not imply any form of special forces or otherwise, it is simply a term used for gathering information essentially.
G. MORGAN
Capt, USAF
Retired


Johnston

  • Posts: 422
Re: Adding a Reconnaissance section to the unit
« Reply #12 on: April 11, 2015, 12:24:44 PM »
I'll end this on  the Brawler information.

 We have no unit dedicated for Reconnaissance, or any super secret squirrel delta force ranger seal space ship door gunner section here, and we wont.

Brawler by its trade of being "Big and Slow" has to depart NORMALLY, but not always, before the rest of the Task force. IF they are flying, if they are driving in MRAPS, we leave at the same time. But an Blackhawk can cover 10KM's faster than an Bradley can. Its just the nature of the beast. While leaving early, we typically get to the Area of Operations, the average for my Bradley, is about 5 minutes before the rest of the task force. This allows us the advantage to "Recon" the LZ the task force Commander picked, so they don't land on top of Anti Air, or the enemies motor pool. We typically do this from 2-3KM away from the LZ using our high power thermals. Once they land, we play catch up and join the task force. Then operate side by side the rest of the Operation.


MAJ (Ret) Irwin

  • 11A Infantry Officer
  • Retired
  • Posts: 373
Re: Adding a Reconnaissance section to the unit
« Reply #13 on: April 11, 2015, 02:55:22 PM »
Don't forget that the Apatche acts in the recon role from time to time.
W. IRWIN
MAJ, USA
Retired


Hopp

  • Posts: 326
Re: Adding a Reconnaissance section to the unit
« Reply #14 on: May 02, 2015, 06:51:00 AM »
Brawler are Shock troopers.  Useful in oh so many ways...

Apaches are reconnaissance among other things.

On the other hand, M2 Bradleys exist in the Cavalry Squadron of any Brigade and are task organized to maneuver BNs or act as a single cohesive unit.  However, the Cav Sqdn can dump the Bradleys for medium lift capable HMMWVs to provide light wheeled cavalry on an objective area (Air mobile by Blackhawk or CH-47).

Brawler is Cavalry.  Heavy Cavalry when mounted on M2s.

From wikipedia
"In many modern armies, the term cavalry is still often used to refer to units that are a combat arm of the armed forces which in the past filled the traditional horse-borne land combat light cavalry roles. These include scouting, skirmishing with enemy reconnaissance elements to deny them knowledge of own disposition of troops, forward security, offensive reconnaissance by combat, defensive screening of friendly forces during retrograde movement, retreat, restoration of command and control, deception, battle handover and passage of lines, relief in place, linkup, breakout operations, and raiding. The shock role, traditionally filled by heavy cavalry, is generally filled by units with the "armored" designation."